European Corporate Governance Report 2011
Challenging board performance
We have seen a profound change in the scope, complexity and impact of the multiple forces that shape the boards of the region's leading companies. To demonstrate the state of corporate governance in Europe we illustrated our results across six key areas: availability, independence, diversity of experience, evaluation, competitiveness of the remuneration and transparency.
|
|

|
| The following table breaks down statistics for each country compared to the European average. Select a country name to download a PDF report containing specific country data. |
|
| |
2011 European average |
54 |
54 |
63 |
35 |
40 |
79 |
 |
Austria |
43 |
55 |
45 |
29 |
6 |
75 |
 |
Belgium |
51 |
47 |
61 |
30 |
31 |
73 |
 |
Denmark |
46 |
46 |
66 |
37 |
34 |
72 |
 |
Finland |
56 |
73 |
69 |
25 |
20 |
92 |
 |
France |
55 |
39 |
70 |
51 |
33 |
85 |
 |
Germany |
54 |
39 |
60 |
18 |
64 |
61 |
 |
Italy |
48 |
56 |
53 |
27 |
43 |
83 |
 |
Netherlands |
61 |
81 |
73 |
45 |
34 |
81 |
 |
Norway |
46 |
52 |
58 |
27 |
8 |
62 |
 |
Poland |
38 |
56 |
41 |
19 |
14 |
58 |
 |
Portugal |
46 |
41 |
53 |
19 |
42 |
70 |
 |
Spain |
54 |
30 |
52 |
29 |
38 |
69 |
 |
Sweden |
62 |
51 |
75 |
41 |
36 |
93 |
 |
Switzerland |
56 |
63 |
78 |
19 |
74 |
93 |
 |
United Kingdom |
68 |
80 |
80 |
63 |
76 |
91 |
| |
Notes
Figures are in percent. denotes highest ranking, lowest. We collected quantitative data on over 400 publicly listed companies from 15 countries in Europe and scored each company on six key areas as follows: Availability - the scoring spans 13 criteria classified into three categories: the actual number and attendance of meetings; the structure of committees and the number of board positions held by the chairman and directors. Independence - the scoring is based on ratio of independent directors on the board and each committee, independent chairmanship, and the background of the chairman. Diversity of experience - this is based on 12 criteria, which include nationality of board members, diversity of backgrounds, CEO representation, length of tenure, turnover, staggering of terms, as well as the variety of experience and roles within boards. Evaluation - it takes into account the frequency, the process and the leadership of board evaluation. Competitiveness of remuneration - based on the average remuneration levels. Transparency - it shows whether companies publish standard information on board directors and corporate governance. |
|
|
The full European Corporate Governance Report 2011 "Challenging board performance", published by Heidrick & Struggles, contains 60 pages of data and comment on thirteen key areas of corporate governance.
Download PDF (940kb)

The South Africa Corporate Governance Report 2011 "Challenging board performance", published by Heidrick & Struggles is also available.
Download PDF (1mb)
To order further copies of either, please email cg2011@heidrick.com
For press inquiries please contact emeamarketing@heidrick.com
"I think there is a real challenge for boards: how do you go from good process and governance to delivering substantive results and value-adding risk mitigation?"
|